INDOOR-OUTDOOR flow

Identifying and training for the differences in playing skills between indoor and field hockey is crucial for players and coaches to optimize performance in each variant of the sport. There is a good level of transferance between the two and the potential to uplift your performances in both.

Technical Skills

Ball Control & Security

In indoor hockey, the smaller playing area and reduced space often require you to have tighter ball control and quicker stickwork to maneuver effectively and pry open some space. If you observe how well the ball is secured particularly along the boards in indoor hockey using forward and back movements it will give you an awareness of effective head and body positioning for replication on the turf in tight areas. On the side-boards it is a linear movement vs operating in a forward and back V on the turf that is a more usual application of this skill.

To create something from nothing while still securing the ball in possession in both corner congestion and attacking circle compression, an indoor player will sometimes apply spins. While we see a lot of this in baseline contests on the turf it is used less frequently in creating space for shooting and resetting midfield transitions.It has the potential to do do so however, if done judiciously.

Certainly, ball carrying over longer distances on the turf requires an endurance capability, sprinting over distance repeatedly, where on a court your carries are of a short burst nature. Crucially though, indoor carries sharpen your smooth stick-ball contact in the carry movement.

Eliminations

Space and time pressures indoors and short carry distances may help lay the foundations for more rapid short eliminations in crowded space on the field . With the transferance of the more condensed technique from court to turf you get the added options of 3D carry on the plastic grass to broaden your repertoire. Sharpened speed AND 3D become a lethal combination.

Passing Accuracy

Indoor hockey demands precise passing due to the limited space; it is absolutely unforgiving when it comes to accuracy. Given the speed of the current field game, with its increasingly compressed spaces in circles, along baselines and in corners, the tight needle threaded passes from court play are becoming increasingly useful on the turf.

Tactical Awareness

Indoor hockey typically requires players to adapt to a more dynamic style of play i.e. a lot more run and gun, with frequent transitions between attack and defense. Although, its field counterparts are following suit more uniformly than ever. Understanding positioning in relation to the boards and quick decision-making are essential skill on the floor. Of particular salience is an appreciation of pass-receive-run angles and spots of potential containment. Field hockey players, on the other hand, must be adept at exploiting space on the larger field with more flexibility on offer in terms of lead distances and repeatability. They also benefit from the aerial route as an ever present option to create opportunity or get out of trouble.

Pressing and Defending

In indoor hockey, the close proximity of players necessitates a high-pressure defense and coordinated pressing to win back possession quickly. With the lesser number of players the breadth and depth of pressing structures is not as overwhelming in terms of cognitive load but the need to apply and adjust at lightning speed may be greater than on the plastic grass. The flush to surface blocking tackle in indoor is an effective tool on the field depending upon carrying techniques you are defending against. Field hockey players may need to develop a balance between pressing high and maintaining defensive structure over larger areas.

In terms of learning and applying effective body position and space closure skills indoor hockey is a must.

Physical Conditioning

Speed and Agility

Indoor hockey requires explosive speed and directional change to capitalize on limited space and evade opponents effectively. Alactic preparation as part of periodised plans is something indoor coches can not overlook. Court player explosiveness off the mark and near-istant unidirectional movements in response to an opponent, repeatedly is excelent preparation for the Field season. Turf hockey players may have a slightly greater emphais on endurance and aerobic capacity to sustain performance over longer periods and distances on the larger field.

Strength and Contact

While both variants require strength, indoor hockey players may need to adapt to more physical contact due to the confined space and increased likelihood of collisions along the boards. It may be argued the body position is also in a lower squat for longer periods in indoor to maintian a low centre of gravity essential for the flat blocking tackles. This will require attention to strength work including plyometrics that focus on the full circumference of the core, mobility, pelic girdle stability and lower limb power.

Game Strategy and Adaptability

Transition Play

Both indoor and field hockey require players to transition quickly between attack and defense. However, the dynamics of transition play may differ significantly between the two variants, necessitating adaptability and strategic awareness. Although the speed of change is electric on the court the length of time and distance for a transition is far shorter than on the turf.

Set Pieces

The execution of set pieces, such as penalty corners and free hits, may vary in indoor and field hockey due to the playing surface and time-distance-space constraints. Players and coaches must tailor set-piece strategies accordingly.

References

1. Lidor, R., & Ziv, G. (2011). Physical and Physiological Attributes of Female Basketball Players—With Special Reference to Anthropometric, Anaerobic Power, and Strength Characteristics. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(2), 575–585. [DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bf03ea](https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bf03ea)

2. Reilly, T. (2003). Motion Analysis and Physiological Demands. In T. Reilly, J. Cabri, & D. Araújo (Eds.), Science and Football V (pp. 3–12). Routledge.

3. Faude, O., Koch, T., & Meyer, T. (2012). Straight sprinting is the most frequent action in goal situations in professional football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(7), 625–631. [DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.665940](https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.665940)

4. Bloomfield, J., Polman, R., & O’Donoghue, P. (2007). Physical Demands of Different Positions in FA Premier League Soccer. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 6(1), 63–70.

5. Hughes, M., & Bartlett, R. (2002). The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(10), 739–754. [DOI: 10.1080/026404102320675602](https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102320675602)

Nascimento H, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Martinez-Perez C, Sánchez-Tena MÁ. Vision in Futsal Players: Coordination and Reaction Time. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 27;18(17):9069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179069. PMID: 34501658; PMCID: PMC8431160.